28 research outputs found
Spatial Heterogeneity in Soil Microbes Alters Outcomes of Plant Competition
Plant species vary greatly in their responsiveness to nutritional soil mutualists, such as mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia, and this responsiveness is associated with a trade-off in allocation to root structures for resource uptake. As a result, the outcome of plant competition can change with the density of mutualists, with microbe-responsive plant species having high competitive ability when mutualists are abundant and non-responsive plants having high competitive ability with low densities of mutualists. When responsive plant species also allow mutualists to grow to greater densities, changes in mutualist density can generate a positive feedback, reinforcing an initial advantage to either plant type. We study a model of mutualist-mediated competition to understand outcomes of plant-plant interactions within a patchy environment. We find that a microbe-responsive plant can exclude a non-responsive plant from some initial conditions, but it must do so across the landscape including in the microbe-free areas where it is a poorer competitor. Otherwise, the non-responsive plant will persist in both mutualist-free and mutualist-rich regions. We apply our general findings to two different biological scenarios: invasion of a non-responsive plant into an established microbe-responsive native population, and successional replacement of non-responders by microbe-responsive species. We find that resistance to invasion is greatest when seed dispersal by the native plant is modest and dispersal by the invader is greater. Nonetheless, a native plant that relies on microbial mutualists for competitive dominance may be particularly vulnerable to invasion because any disturbance that temporarily reduces its density or that of the mutualist creates a window for a non-responsive invader to establish dominance. We further find that the positive feedbacks from associations with beneficial soil microbes create resistance to successional turnover. Our theoretical results constitute an important first step toward developing a general understanding of the interplay between mutualism and competition in patchy landscapes, and generate qualitative predictions that may be tested in future empirical studies
Throughflow centrality is a global indicator of the functional importance of species in ecosystems
To better understand and manage complex systems like ecosystems it is
critical to know the relative contribution of system components to system
functioning. Ecologists and social scientists have described many ways that
individuals can be important; This paper makes two key contributions to this
research area. First, it shows that throughflow, the total energy-matter
entering or exiting a system component, is a global indicator of the relative
contribution of the component to the whole system activity. It is global
because it includes the direct and indirect exchanges among community members.
Further, throughflow is a special case of Hubbell status as defined in social
science. This recognition effectively joins the concepts, enabling ecologists
to use and build on the broader centrality research in network science. Second,
I characterize the distribution of throughflow in 45 empirically-based trophic
ecosystem models. Consistent with expectations, this analysis shows that a
small fraction of the system components are responsible for the majority of the
system activity. In 73% of the ecosystem models, 20% or less of the nodes
generate 80% or more of the total system throughflow. Four or fewer dominant
nodes are required to account for 50% of the total system activity. 121 of the
130 dominant nodes in the 45 ecosystem models could be classified as primary
producers, dead organic matter, or bacteria. Thus, throughflow centrality
indicates the rank power of the ecosystems components and shows the power
concentration in the primary production and decomposition cycle. Although these
results are specific to ecosystems, these techniques build on flow analysis
based on economic input-output analysis. Therefore these results should be
useful for ecosystem ecology, industrial ecology, the study of urban
metabolism, as well as other domains using input-output analysis.Comment: 7 figures, 2 table
Weighting and indirect effects identify keystone species in food webs
Species extinctions are accelerating globally, yet the mechanisms that maintain local biodiversity remain poorly understood. The extinction of species that feed on or are fed on by many others (i.e. ‘hubs’) has traditionally been thought to cause the greatest threat of further biodiversity loss. Very little attention has been paid to the strength of those feeding links (i.e. link weight) and the prevalence of indirect interactions. Here, we used a dynamical model based on empirical energy budget data to assess changes in ecosystem stability after simulating the loss of species according to various extinction scenarios. Link weight and/or indirect effects had stronger effects on food‐web stability than the simple removal of ‘hubs’, demonstrating that both quantitative fluxes and species dissipating their effects across many links should be of great concern in biodiversity conservation, and the potential for ‘hubs’ to act as keystone species may have been exaggerated to date
Functional Integration of Ecological Networks through Pathway Proliferation
Large-scale structural patterns commonly occur in network models of complex
systems including a skewed node degree distribution and small-world topology.
These patterns suggest common organizational constraints and similar functional
consequences. Here, we investigate a structural pattern termed pathway
proliferation. Previous research enumerating pathways that link species
determined that as pathway length increases, the number of pathways tends to
increase without bound. We hypothesize that this pathway proliferation
influences the flow of energy, matter, and information in ecosystems. In this
paper, we clarify the pathway proliferation concept, introduce a measure of the
node--node proliferation rate, describe factors influencing the rate, and
characterize it in 17 large empirical food-webs. During this investigation, we
uncovered a modular organization within these systems. Over half of the
food-webs were composed of one or more subgroups that were strongly connected
internally, but weakly connected to the rest of the system. Further, these
modules had distinct proliferation rates. We conclude that pathway
proliferation in ecological networks reveals subgroups of species that will be
functionally integrated through cyclic indirect effects.Comment: 29 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables, Submitted to Journal of Theoretical
Biolog